|
November 2001, Minutes
Mesa State College Faculty Senate
Minutes for November 1, 2001 Meeting
MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom Acker, Barbara Borst, Jim Buckley,
Jill Cordova (for Brian Udermann), Mike Gizzi, Phil Kavanagh, Doug
O'Roark, John Sluder, Cindy Thomas, Russ Walker, Carrie McVean Waring,
Mary Zimmerer
GUESTS: Susan Becker, Clare Boulanger, Mike Gallagher, Sam Gingerich,
Valerie Horton, Bryan Howard, Gary Looft, and Hasson Tavossi
The meeting was convened at 3:30 pm by Senate President Doug O'Roark.
I. Announcements
Mike Gizzi (FACT representative) reported that much of
the discussion at the October Board of Trustees meeting focused
on the state's budget problems. Dale Mingilton (chair of the Board)
asked that faculty be involved in developing each college's response
to the budget problems. Increases in insurance costs were also announced.
II. Meeting Minutes
A motion was made to approve the minutes of the October
4 meeting of the Faculty Senate (Sluder/Zimmerer). The motion passed.
A motion was made to approve the minutes of the October 18 meeting
of the Faculty Senate (Buckley/Gizzi). The motion passed.
A motion was made to receive the minutes of September 25 meeting
of the Graduate Council (Zimmerer/Thomas). The motion passed.
It was noted that the September 27 minutes of the Curriculum Committee
were missing an attachment on proposed new curriculum approval procedures,
and that the date on the header of the last page needed to be corrected.
A motion was made to approve the minutes as amended, excluding the
proposed new curriculum approval procedures that were missing (Gizzi/Gizzi).
Gary Looft (Curriculum Committee chair) will distribute the proposed
procedures to Senators before their next meeting.
III. Draft Statement of Role and Mission
President Mike Gallagher distributed the latest revision
of the Mesa State College Role and Mission Statement, which was
prepared at the request of the Governor's Blue Ribbon Panel on Higher
Education. Existing documents (such as the Academic Master Plan)
provided a good start for the statement, which was revised to reflect
comments solicited from faculty and staff in October. Given that
the panel's recommendations will probably establish roles and missions
for the next ten to twenty years, it is crucial that this document
reflect our vision for the future of MSC.
The ensuing discussion touched on several points:
· In the context of Colorado higher
education in 2001, the term "regional educational provider"
implies the flexibility associated with the formerly popular term
"charter school".
· Broadly speaking, Gallagher sees our
region as western Colorado, eastern Utah, and perhaps southern Wyoming.
·MSC currently has responsibility for
fulfilling a community college role, but has no access to community
college funding. It would be beneficial to have a closer relationship
with the community college system, hence the proposal to reorganize
the School of Applied Technology as the Western Colorado Community
College. In a sense, this would merely be formalizing an arrangement
that already exists. It is possible that at some distant time, new
faculty will be hired exclusively for either the community college
or for Mesa State. He also reported that some members of the Grand
Junction and Montrose communities would like to see a new community
college that is completely separate from Mesa State.
·Gallagher noted that the proposal to
expand our graduate offerings in selected professional fields is
an initial attempt to lay the foundation for starting a second graduate
program.
·Gallagher believes that changing our
name from college to university may help our enrollment, our recruiting
for faculty and staff, and our success at obtaining grants. He noted
that each state college except for Metro State was making the same
request, and that about 90% of former state colleges nationwide
had already made the change. It is unlikely that there will be any
immediate benefits to salaries.
·Gallagher will present the Role and
Mission Statement to the Panel at a November 16 meeting. He will
emphasize MSC's high productivity, high performance, and low administrative
costs. Gallagher has asked Senate President Doug O'Roark and ASG
President Bryan Howard to accompany him.
A motion was made to endorse the Role and Mission Statement (Gizzi/Thomas).
The motion passed.
IV. Course Evaluation Forms
The forms used for surveying student opinion on faculty
performance have been revised so as to be usable by a new scanner.
There is no change to the questions or the choices for answers.
The Senate requested that item 2 in the optional data section be
amended to include master's level students, and that the letters
be removed from inside the bubbles that go with each choice in the
required section. A motion was made to approve the new form as amended
(Sluder/Thomas). The motion passed.
V. Survey of Library Services
Valerie Horton (Director of Library) informed the Senate
that students and faculty will be surveyed about library service
in late November. She asked faculty to volunteer to distribute and
collect surveys during their classes. She distributed a report on
the last survey of library users, which took place in 1997.
VI. Report from the Faculty to Faculty Conference
CCHE's goal for the recent Faculty to Faculty Conference
was to have faculty working groups develop general education competencies
that would be common to all Colorado colleges and universities.
Clare Boulanger reported that results were mixed. Most of the faculty
that attended felt that this effort was unnecessary, unwise, and
may reduce academic freedom. It's not clear what CCHE's next move
will be. Apparently, there is also some dissension among the community
colleges regarding their common competencies, which have been advertised
by CCHE as a successful model.
VII. Faculty / Staff Club
Hasson Tavossi distributed a proposal for a Faculty Staff
Club. Discussion was deferred to a future meeting.
A motion to adjourn was made at 5:00 pm (Walker/Sluder). The motion
passed.
|