|
August 23, 2001 Meeting of the Mesa State College Faculty
Senate
MEMBERS
PRESENT: Tom Acker, Barbara Borst, Jim Buckley, Mike
Gizzi, Phil Kavanagh, Doug O'Roark, Eric Schruers, John Sluder,
Gayla Jo Slauson, Cindy Thomas, Brian Udermann, Russ Walker,
Carrie McVean Waring, Mary Zimmerer
GUESTS:
Jim Brock, Morris Brown, Sam Gingerich, Bryan Howard
The
meeting was convened at 3:30 pm by Senate President Doug O'Roark.
I.
Meeting Minutes
Draft
minutes of the May 3, 2001 Senate meeting were not yet available
for approval, so action was deferred until the September 7,
2001 meeting.
II.
Report on the June FACT and Trustee Meetings
Mike
Gizzi, Gayla Jo Slauson, and Russ Walker reported on the June
7-8 FACT and Trustee meetings.
The
Faculty Trustee rotates to Metro State College for the 2001-02
school year. Metro faculty elected Gene Saxe, a long-time
FACT member, as Trustee.
The
FACT Chair rotates to Adams State College for the 2001-03
school years. FACT elected Ed Crowther, the Adams
Faculty Senate President, as chair.
FACT
met directly with the Trustees for the first time this year.
FACT members expressed their desire to meet more frequently
with the Trustees. The new FACT chair will work to
develop more of a problem-solving partnership between FACT
and the Trustees.
The
Trustees met with seven Mesa faculty members for an informal
discussion. MSC faculty talked about the evolving
nature of our college and encouraged the Trustees to approve
President Mike Gallagher's request to increase the Mesa
salary pool by an additional 1% through reallocation of
internal funds. The Trustees approved the salary request
in their meeting the next day.
This
year's Office of State College Faculty Professional Development
Conference will be September 28-29 in Frisco and will focus
on active learning.
III.
Student-Published Information on Courses and Faculty
ASG
President Bryan Howard reported that ASG has discussed developing
a public evaluation and assessment of courses and faculty.
The students felt that asking for semester-end course and
instructor evaluations to be made public would not be particularly
informative and could be divisive. They proposed instead
that faculty be requested to provide a profile of each course.
As a point of departure, the profile could include information
such as that often provided on a course syllabus. President
Howard pointed out that students are most often interested
in how the course is conducted (e.g, lecture versus discussion)
and the method of grading (e.g., exams versus papers).
Senate will discuss this proposal at future meetings.
IV.
Human Subjects Committee and Institutional Animal Care and
Use Committee
Senate
President Doug O'Roark reminded Senate of a campus-wide email
sent by President Gallagher over the summer. In order
to comply with the federal requirement for a "standing
administrative contact point", the Human Subjects Committee
and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee now report
directly to the college president rather than to the Faculty
Senate. President O'Roark asked senators to check with
their departments and report back at the next meeting on any
issues related to this change. Cindy Lueb, our Director of
Sponsored Programs, will attend a future Senate meeting to
discuss other changes to research oversight dictated by federal
requirements.
V.
Academic Master Plan
Vice
President of Academic Affairs Sam Gingerich distributed the
August 2001 version of the Academic
Master Plan and noted that the administration
had added a couple of goals (including periodic review of
low-enrollment programs) since Senate last reviewed the plan
in May. He requested that Senate discuss the plan for
approval at its next meeting. He emphasized that the
plan is a "living document" that will be reviewed
and updated annually. The plan will be posted on the
college Web site, and Jim Brock will send out an all-campus
email announcing the plan's availability for campus-wide review.
Faculty are requested to provide comments to their senate
representative. Staff are asked to provide their comments
to Doug O'Roark.
VI.
Draft Guidelines for Tenure Portfolios
President
O'Roark distributed general guidelines
drafted by the deans for preparation of tenure portfolios.
The purpose of the guidelines is to establish a more uniform
presentation of materials submitted by faculty. Faculty
can deviate from the guidelines (within the constraints of
the MSC Professional Staff Policy Handbook, Section 9) as
appropriate in order to present their best case for tenure.
Questions
were raised as to whether these were truly guidelines rather
than requirements, and whether they should be approved as
requirements. Sam Gingerich noted that the Faculty Senate
has the authority to change the guidelines to requirements.
He expects that similar guidelines will be drafted for promotion
portfolios and comprehensive evaluations. Senate will
discuss this issue further at its next meeting.
VII.
Meetings with Local Members of the General Assembly
President
O'Roark asked the Senate if there was interest in meeting
with Representatives Berry and Smith and Senator Teck.
It was decided to invite each to a separate meeting of the
Faculty Senate for an update on legislative issues affecting
MSC along with a question and answer session.
VIII.
Four-Year Graduation Plan and the Common Core
President
O'Roark distributed a letter from CCHE Executive Director
Tim Foster to Mike Gallagher and a copy of MSC's draft
Four-Year Graduation Plan. Foster's letter
described a bill passed by the General Assembly earlier this
year (HB01-1263, sponsored by Representative King).
Among other topics, the bill addressed the degree to which
students have the opportunity to complete their bachelor's
degree in four years. In response, the MSC administration
has drafted a Four-Year Graduation Plan. Under this
plan, students who meet several conditions will be guaranteed
that the courses they need to graduate in four years will
be available, or that appropriate substitutions will be made.
Sam Gingerich estimated that only 100 to 125 MSC students
would be affected each year. This plan will be discussed
in future Senate meetings. Doug O'Roark encouraged senators
to review the plan carefully.
HB01-1263
also requires that higher education institutions establish
a "common core" to facilitate course transfers.
This requirement appears to be at odds with the equivalency
matrix approach required in HB01-1298, a bill sponsored by
Representative Berry. Sam Gingerich noted that the common
core and transferability will be the topic of the upcoming
Faculty-to-Faculty Conference.
IX.
Other Issues
President
O'Roark asked the Senate to identify other topics or issues
of interest to them for possible future discussion.
Those issues included:
The
apparent emphasis on use of technology versus the actual availability
of technology.
Tuition
waivers for faculty dependents, and the ability of faculty
to take classes.Changing the performance evaluation period
to coincide with the school year instead of the calendar year.
Possible
distribution of faculty pay checks over a nine month period
instead of an eleven month period.
The
determination of faculty salary raises effective August 2001.
Doug O'Roark said that he would invite the deans to explain
to the Senate their approach to determining raises.
A
motion was made at 5:00 pm to adjourn (Walker/Sluder).
The motion was approved.
|