|
Faculty Senate Meeting Minutes
February 15, 2007
Senators: Tim Hatten, Keith Fritz, Bill McCraken, Bill Tiernan,
Tim Casey, Maureen Neal, Steve Werman, Jane Arledge, Barbara Borst,
Ellie Baldwin, Doug O'Roark, Judy Goodhart, Josh Butler
Guests: Carol Futhey, Cathy Barkley, Steve Murray, Joe Richards
Minutes Secretary: Jessica Cowden
I. ANNOUNCEMENTS
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to receive the Curriculum
Committee minutes from January 25, 2007. (Arledge/McCracken)
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve the Curriculum
Committee minutes from November 16, 2007. (Neal/Werman)
Discussion: There were some concerns about the availability of resources
for the addition of an energy management program under the BBA.
Joe Richards reported that the Curriculum Committee posed the same
questions when the proposal was made and they were assured that
there are adequate resources. Tim Hatten added that the new courses
would be filled by adjunct instructors from the industry. Casey
expressed further concern about the stability of a program staffed
entirely with adjuncts and suggested that we rethink our staffing
patterns to see if this indicates a growing trend towards adding
programs staffed with adjuncts versus tenure-track positions. Werman
pointed out that it may be wise to start off a program with adjuncts
in case the program does not succeed. Arledge also suggested doing
more advanced planning and research to support the addition of a
new program that could determine its success ahead of time.
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve the Curriculum
Committee minutes from December 7, 2006. (Tiernan/Casey)
Discussion: Casey had one correction: INTS 101 is actually an introduction
to "International Studies," not "Interdisciplinary."
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to receive the Graduate
Council minutes from December 6, 2007. (McCracken/Tiernan)
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to approve the Graduate
Council minutes from December 6, 2007. (Casey/McCracken)
Discussion: The staffing of the recently added Master's in Education
cognate was discussed. The instructors will be made up of some MSC
tenure-track faculty as well as .8 adjuncts, many of whom are retired
principals and superintendents who are able to deal with the fluctuating
schedule demanded by the program.
III. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE UPDATE (HATTEN)
" The primary topic of discussion was program reviews and
the roles of the Curriculum Committee and the Faculty Senate therein,
which will be discussed further later in the meeting.
" An expansion of the science building and other conceptual
ideas were discussed. Josh Penry is to spearhead the project.
IV. STANDING COMMITTEES POLICY MANUAL
Casey presented the newly drafted policy manual. The purpose of
the manual is to give the standing committees a set of guidelines
and procedures for operation.
" Casey also suggested further amending the manual by adding
a section D to cover non-Senate related standing committees like
the Tenure and Promotion Committee and the Human Subjects Committee.
" The manual needs to be adopted with a 2/3 vote, preferably
at the next Senate meeting or shortly thereafter in order to clarify
the roles of the committees as soon as possible.
" There was also a proposal to expand the Assessment Committee
to represent each department as well as accommodate the increased
workload.
" Casey welcomed suggestions to improve/modify the manual.
" Arledge asked if the guidelines for the Distinguished Faculty
award could be added to this manual or if it would be more appropriate
elsewhere.
" Casey suggested adopting the manual and posting it on the
web so that as changes are made to the document they can be updated
and easily accessed by the faculty.
" The Senate commended Casey, Neal and Butler on their work.
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to receive this draft
of the manual. (Arledge/Tiernan)
V. KINESIOLOGY (FRITZ)
The currently policy doesn't allow for multiple activity courses
to be used as electives. The Kinesiology Department feels that these
courses are valuable and represent a wide variety of activities.
They also believe that if these courses were allowed as electives,
the increased interest could lead to the addition of new courses.
No other department's courses are restricted. A student can take
as many dance and theatre classes as they would like, for example,
without a limitation on how many will count towards their electives.
Arledge pointed out that the two activity course graduation requirement
is unusual for most college and clearly demonstrates the College's
emphasis and degree to which they value the health and wellness
and activity courses.
" Tiernan commented that this proposed change could potentially
water down the academic requirements for graduation.
" Dr. Murray pointed out that these courses do confer to the
1/3 academic requirement as prescribed by CCHE. He added that there
is no difference between dance courses and activity courses, yet
students are allowed to take as many dance courses as they'd like.
" The Senate questioned the role of the Senate in this discussion
and wondered if it would be better served in the Curriculum Committee.
" Neal suggested sending this issue to a more appropriate committee
for further discussion and potential action.
" The suggestion is to allow one more credit per semester of
activity courses to count towards their electives beyond the two
that are currently required. Werman suggested that the issue go
to the Curriculum Committee since it is a change in electives policy.
Fritz suggested that it go to Academic Policies who could further
discuss this and send it back to the Senate for the final action.
" Much of the Senate agreed that students should be allowed
to take whatever they wish to take to count towards their electives.
" Werman also questioned whether the definition of an elective
would have to be modified.
The movement was made, seconded, and passed to refer this issue
to the Academic Policies Committee for further study and encourage
them to invite Fritz and Murray to present their case and then report
back to the Senate. (Arledge/Neal)
VI. ROLE OF THE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE AND FACULTY SENATE IN THE
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
Joe Richards explained to the Senate that a change in the Program
Review process was instituted last year when the Curr. Committee
decided to start bringing in external reviewers rather than solely
relying on each program's self-analysis reports. At this point,
it now seems redundant for the Curriculum Committee to further analyze
the analyses provided both by the external reviewers as well as
the self-studies. The Curriculum Committee is in agreement that
the only committee that seems necessary to the process in its current
structure would possibly be the Assessment Committee.
Werman pointed out that the Curriculum Committee formerly served
the purpose of suggesting new goals and items to focus on for subsequent
reviews. He proposed that the current structure might be best served
by sending the reviews as well as the duty of making suggestions
for future improvements to the VPAA's office rather than to the
Faculty Senate. Hatten's suggestion was that the Senate treat it
as an item for discussion rather than action so that the Senate
could add their suggestions and then send it all off to the VPAA's
office, which is where it eventually winds up regardless.
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to eliminate the responsibility
of reviewing the self-studies and the external reviews from the
Curriculum Committee as part of the Program Review process. (McCracken/Arledge)
The motion was made, seconded, and passed to extend the meeting.
(Arledge/McCracken)
VII. GRADE CHANGE POLICY
Hatten, Casey and Tiernan met with representatives from Nursing
as well as the President, Carol Futhey, Andy Breckel, etc. It was
revealed that a member of the nursing faculty changed the grade
to an "I" at Breckel's request. There was, evidently,
some degree of misunderstanding between Kristy Reuss and Andy Breckel
as he felt that he was making the suggestion that the grade be changed
and Reuss felt that he was demanding that they make the change.
The meeting was adjourned at
Respectfully submitted,
Jessica Cowden
Minutes Secretary
|